Delegates retain church’s homosexuality stance May 4, 2004 By Linda Green and Kathy Gilbert* | A UMNS photo by Mike DuBose. The Rev. Eddie Fox watches General Conference vote on Paragraph 161G.
| PITTSBURGH
(UMNS) - Delegates to the United Methodist Church’s top legislative
body voted to retain the denomination’s statement that homosexual
practice is incompatible with Christian teaching.On May 4, delegates voted to slightly alter the current language in the Social Principles. They
deleted the words "although we do not" from a sentence in Paragraph
161G that goes on to say "condone the practice of homosexuality…" The
delegates approved a revision to the language, which now says, "The
United Methodist Church does not condone the practice of homosexuality
and considers this practice incompatible with Christian teaching." They
also added a clause that United Methodists "will seek to live together
in Christian community." An
original motion from the Church and Society Committee stated, "We
recognize that Christians disagree on the compatibility of homosexual
practice with Christian teaching." But delegates approved a minority
report that did not include that phrase. All legislation brought to
General Conference is processed through committees such as Church and
Society. The
Rev. Eddie Fox of Nashville, Tenn., said in a press conference after
the 579-376 vote that if the church had not retained the language of
Paragraph 161G of the Social Principles, that "serious consequences
could have happened (and) a possible hemorrhage could have occurred." | A UMNS photo by Paul Jeffrey. Supporters wanting more inclusive language protest General Conference decision. | Fox
said the church was in "desperate" need of a clear, authoritative,
declaratory statement made with compassion. He spoke in the assembly in
favor of the change.Numerous delegates from Africa spoke against homosexuality and requested that the church move forward in proclaiming the gospel. One
said that in African culture, it is "taboo" to speak about sexuality.
"We do not want to be drawn into the issue," said Kasap ‘Owan Tshibang
of the church’s North Katanga Area in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Muland
Aying Kambol, a delegate from the southern Congo asked if it is
"permissible to spend so much time speaking about sin." If that is the
vision of the church, he said, then "our church will surely die." Samuel Quire of Liberia stated that the church "cannot license people to go to hell." When
asked if the approved statement was a response to the recent acquittal
of a lesbian pastor, Fox replied that the delegate’s decision "is a
response to all that has happened in society, in all churches, including
that trial." He spoke of the importance of a clear statement from the
United Methodist Church because it is being watched by other
denominations. | A UMNS photo by Paul Jeffrey. Bishop
Donald A. Ott (right) picks up pieces of a communion chalice
intentionally broken during a protest at General Conference. | The
Rev. James Preston of Rockford, Ill., said the adopted statement was
not a message of compassion but one that "clearly said that gays and
lesbians are not welcome in the church.""Hemorrhaging
has already occurred, and I assure you that following this General
Conference, quietly and with tears, we will splinter in many divisions,"
he said. The church did not speak the truth about itself and had a
"healing option" but chose not to use it, he stated. The
Rev. Margaret Mallory of Perrysburg, Ohio, reminded delegates that the
church is of two minds on the issue. "We do not become ‘less than’
because we admit that we disagree. In fact, we become ‘more than’
because we tell the truth and we live the truth." Fox said the decision is a statement that is "important to the ministry we do and focuses on the call to spread the gospel." *Green and Gilbert are United Methodist News Service news writers. News media contact: (412) 325-6080 during General Conference, April 27-May 7. After May 10: (615) 742-5470.
|