Georgia children's home settles lawsuit; questions remain
11/17/2003 News media contact: Linda Green · (615) 742-5470 · Nashville, Tenn By Alice M. Smith* ATLANTA
(UMNS) - The United Methodist Children's Home has settled a lawsuit in
which it had been charged with discrimination and violating the state
constitution by denying non-Christians the right to work at the home.
The
home, operated by the denomination's North Georgia Annual (regional)
Conference, settled its lawsuit out of court Oct. 30, about three weeks
after the Georgia Department of Human Resources settled its lawsuit with
the same plaintiffs Oct. 9.
The home's directors have not
decided whether to continue accepting children from the state. However,
if it continues its relationship with the state, the home will no longer
base hiring decisions on an applicant's religious background except in
limited cases that are spelled out in the settlement.
The
settlement with Aimee Bellmore, a former employee at the home who claims
she was fired because she is a lesbian, and Alan Yorker, a therapist
who says he was denied employment at the home because he is Jewish,
includes an undisclosed amount of money.
However, the Rev.
Richard Puckett, director of development for the Atlanta children's
home, says the amount of the settlement is much less than the legal fees
would have cost if the lawsuit had continued, and the money paid to the
plaintiffs is not coming out of the home's funds.
"If we choose
to continue to take state children, we cannot discriminate in hiring on
the basis of religion, except with respect to the hiring or appointment
of any positions serving a primarily spiritual, ministerial or religious
purpose," wrote Beverly O. Cochran Jr., administrator, and Puckett in a
letter to North Georgia pastors.
The final decision on whether
the home will continue taking state children will be made by the home's
board of directors after the state has issued its new regulations and
contracts, which could take up to 12 months, Puckett said.
Nevertheless,
Cochran said no matter what the state regulations and the home's
response, the agency will continue to care for children who have been
neglected or abused.
"We've been serving kids and families since
1871, helping to ease their pains that basically have resulted from
inadequate family relationships and abuse," he said. "We simply are
going to continue to do this into the long-term future. We are going to
continue to maintain a strong spiritual presence on campus, and we're
going to do this by employing the best people we can."
Although
the home's current policy excludes the hiring of non-Christians, a board
decision in the spring of 2002 - before the lawsuit was filed in July
2002 - allows the hiring of gays and lesbians. However, they must be
celibate and must sign the same agreement that all employees must sign
on the matter of sexuality. The policy quotes from Paragraph 161 of the
United Methodist Book of Discipline and states that individuals should
not engage in a sexual relationship outside of marriage. The home's
policy also prohibits sexual harassment and sexual contact between staff
and the children, and it concludes, "Violations of the above mentioned
shall be grounds for immediate termination from employment."
The
state did not consult with the children's home in its settlement of the
lawsuit, and was willing to settle largely because of the Blaine
amendment to Georgia's constitution, according to Puckett and Cochran's
letter.
"The Blaine amendment was enacted in Georgia and 36 other
states in the 19th century as an anti-Catholic law designed to keep
state funds from going to Catholic parochial schools," Cochran and
Puckett wrote. "Arguably, the amendment also applies more broadly to any
church-related agency or program--children's homes, schools, hospitals,
urban programs and more.
"For many years, the state has
construed the Blaine amendment narrowly and has continued to contract
with faith-based programs such as the United Methodist Children's Home.
However, this lawsuit brought the issue to prominence and resulted in a
settlement that preserves the state's right to contract with faith-based
service providers."
In addition to not being able to restrict
hiring to Christians, the home must also consider a state restriction
that would prohibit the administration from requiring children in its
care to attend services on Sunday morning. Currently, the home takes
children who are Christian, or who do not claim any religion, to United
Methodist churches on Sunday. Children of other religions are allowed
to worship with their own faith communities.
If the homes remain
under the control of the state, children would still be taken to church
if they choose, but they would not be required to attend. Yet, the home
is confident it can design a religious program that would be so
attractive the youth at the home would want to participate, officials
said. Furthermore, the spiritual life on campus would continue to be
specifically Christian and would be overseen by an ordained minister.
Currently,
about 160 youth are in the home's residential programs, with more than
90 percent placed there by the state. State contracts account for 57
percent of the home's operating budget. The state pays a per-diem amount
for every child in its custody who is placed at the home.
If the
home should decide not to continue accepting children from the state,
it would lose state revenue, but the more important issue is what would
happen to the children - those who have been abused or neglected to such
an extent the state has taken over their care.
"The problem is
not the money," Puckett said. "Even if the churches were able to pick up
the difference in money, it's the children we wouldn't get from the
state. The great majority of children in crisis come through the state
system. That's what we would lose if we did not do business with the
state."
In such a situation, some children might remain in
dangerous home situations, or they could be forced out on the streets,
or placed with secular agencies with no religious life at all.
The
decision whether to abide by the state's new policy is one that all
religious agencies that receive state funding will have to make.
Cochran said about 1,300 to 1,500 children live in religious-affiliated residential programs across Georgia.
In
the meantime, settlement of the lawsuit will "let us get back to
focusing on ministry to children and their families in a way that we had
previously," Puckett said. "The lawsuit has detracted from our ability
to move forward in several ways."
The home's staff and others
will watch closely efforts by Georgia Gov. Sonny Perdue to add a clause
to the Blaine amendment that would bring Georgia into line with federal
government policies that do permit religious agencies to hire only
people of their own faith.
The proposed amendment, however, faces
some big hurdles, including passage by two-thirds of both houses of the
Georgia General Assembly and approval by voters in a statewide
referendum.
# # #
*Smith is editor of the Wesleyan Christian Advocate, the newspaper of the North and South Georgia annual conferences.
|
Back : News Archives 2003 Main
|
|
“We believe in God and in each other.”The people of The United Methodist Church
Still Have Questions?
If you have any questions Ask
InfoServ
Purchase a $20 buzzkill t-shirt and help save a life

Buy a t-shirt
|