Home > Our World > News > News Archives by Date > 2011 > June 2011 > News - June 2011
DeLong Church Trial: Questions and answers

 
Translate

6:00 A.M. EDT June 20, 2011



The Rev. Amy DeLong. Photo by Amy Zellmer.
The Rev. Amy DeLong. Photo by Amy Zellmer.
View in Photo Gallery

EDITOR’S NOTE: The Rev. Amy DeLong of Osceola, Wis., will undergo a United Methodist Church trial starting June 21 to respond to a charge that she has violated church law by being a “self-avowed practicing homosexual” and officiating at a same-sex union. UMNS will cover the trial and will post coverage online at www.umc.org and on the UMNS Facebook page. Michele Virnig, director of communications for the Wisconsin Annual (regional) Conference, provided the information below.

What is a church trial?

In a United Methodist church trial, an individual responds to a charge or charges of having violated denominational law, as set forth in the Church’s Book of Discipline.

A trial is described as a “last resort” in the Book of Discipline. When a complaint is filed against someone, the matter is first addressed in a supervisory process and usually resolved. If resolution does not occur, the complaint may be forwarded to the conference committee on investigation, which conducts hearings and decides whether grounds exist for converting the complaint to a charge for trial. The committee notified DeLong on Dec. 10, 2010, of its decision to move forward with a trial.

The conference bishop designates another bishop to preside over the trial, and a jury or “trial court” of 13 clergy members (and two alternates) from the respondent’s annual conference — in this case, the Wisconsin Annual (regional) Conference — hears the case. Nine votes are necessary to convict.

Why is the Rev. Amy DeLong on trial?

She is charged with conducting ceremonies that celebrate same-sex unions, and being “a self-avowed practicing homosexual” — both in violation of ¶2702.1b of The 2008 Book of Discipline, which outlines The United Methodist Church’s law.

DeLong served eight years in pastoral ministry. Since 2006, she has been executive director of Kairos CoMotion, a group that provides advocacy and education on progressive theological issues.



Bishop Linda Lee. A UMNS photo by Mike DuBose.
Bishop Linda Lee. A UMNS photo by Mike DuBose.
View in Photo Gallery

What is the denomination’s official policy on homosexuality?

The United Methodist Church, in the 2008 Book of Discipline, states “all persons are of sacred worth.” However, the denomination regards "the practice of homosexuality as incompatible with Christian teaching.” The church forbids the ordination and appointment of “self-avowed practicing homosexuals.” It also forbids the celebration of same-sex unions by its clergy and in its sanctuaries.

Who will preside over the trial?

The original presiding officer, retired Bishop Bruce Blake, has recused himself from the trial for personal reasons. Bishop Linda Lee of the Wisconsin Conference has selected retired Bishop Clay Foster Lee Jr., of Byram, Miss., as the new presiding officer. He retired in 1996 as bishop of the Holston Conference, which encompasses congregations in eastern Tennessee, southwestern Virginia and northern Georgia.

When will the trial be held?

The church trial, originally scheduled to begin on April 11, is now scheduled to start June 21 at Peace United Methodist Church in Kaukauna, Wis.

Who is representing the church and respondent (defendant)?

The Rev. Thomas Lambrecht, pastor of Faith Community Church in Greenville, Wis., is the counsel for the church at the request of Bishop Linda Lee. Lambrecht is also a board member of Good News, an unofficial evangelical caucus in the denomination, and will begin working for the group in July.

The Rev. Scott Campbell, pastor of Harvard-Epworth United Methodist Church in Cambridge, Mass., is the counsel for DeLong, the respondent. He is a member of the Reconciling Ministries Network, an unofficial caucus advocating for greater inclusion of gays and lesbians in the church.

How are the members of the trial court selected?

The 13 members and two alternates are chosen by the presiding officer — with input from the counsels for the respondent and the church — from a pool of Wisconsin Conference clergy. The Book of Discipline specifies that at least 35 pastors must be named to the jury pool. The bishop’s cabinet — the district superintendents — recommends the names for the pool. Special consideration is given to ensuring that the pool is diverse in terms of race, ethnicity and gender. The counsel for each side has up to four peremptory challenges, as well as unlimited challenges for cause. The alternates will sit as observers and will be prepared to serve if one or two of the original jurors are unable to sit.



Bishop Clay Foster Lee Jr. A UMNS photo by Mike DuBose.
Bishop Clay Foster Lee Jr. A UMNS photo by Mike DuBose.
View in Photo Gallery

What are the possible outcomes of the trial?

No person can predict the outcome. This is in the hands of the jury. With a guilty verdict, the trial court would have a range of penalties to consider, including the removal of ministerial orders or a lesser penalty. While at least nine votes are needed to convict, seven votes by the trial court are necessary to set the penalty.

What happens during the trial?

Bishop Linda Lee will convene the trial and then, by the Book of Discipline, she leaves the proceedings. The presiding officer acts as the judge during the trial but has no authority to determine guilt or innocence. The counsel for the church represents the church. The counsel for the respondent represents the person on trial. The trial begins with the selection of the jury as described above. Once selected, both sides of the trial present their case and can question witnesses. This is followed by the deliberation of the jury and a determination of guilt or innocence, and other possible outcomes. If found guilty, the respondent can appeal to the Committee on Appeals of the Jurisdictional Conference.

Will the trial be open to the public?

Yes. The Book of Discipline provides for open court proceedings at the request of the respondent. However, seating will be limited. No cameras or audio or video recording equipment will be allowed in the courtroom.

Where can I find out more information about the Book of Discipline and the United Methodist judicial process?

Refer to these links:

The 2008 Book of Discipline — Judicial Administration

GCFA Administration and Judicial Procedures Handbook

News media contact: Heather Hahn, Nashville, Tenn., (615) 742-5470 or newsdesk@umcom.org.

Comments will be moderated. Please see our Comment Policy for more information.

NOTE:We are in the process of implementing a new commenting system. Please bear with us during this transition.

Comment Policy
Comments will be moderated. Please see our Comment Policy for more information.

Glad you liked it. Would you like to share?

Sharing this page …

Thanks! Close

Add New Comment

  • Image

Showing 28 comments

  • Olivia 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    I feel that it is completely wrong for a regilious group to judge anyone. In all regilions people are taught that God loves all people and yet this church is judging. I thought that the goal of this church was to let ALL people join and feel accepted, but how can that happen if you are putting one of your own memebers on trial. Many people say that they want world peace. How do any of you except that to happen when you put people on trial based on their sexuality. It is wrong and I hope that the day comes when you have to answer to a higher power for what you have done. I wonder if any of you really understand what your motoe means. When I read it now I think it is a slap in the face to anyone who would think of going to our churchs. You claim to have open hearts, minds, and doors. REALLY!!!!! Maybe you should re think that one. Lastly, I hope that you are able to sleep at night knowing that your day will come when you are asked if you loved all Goda children and you will not be able to say yes. I support DeLong and want she did.
  • Pattie 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    I am a member of the UMC and I am ashamed that you have convicted a person based on the fact that she is following her heart. I believe that my God is a just God and he loves and created all of us. He wants all of his children to be happy and love. What kind of Christian feels that they can sit in judgement of other human beings and what they feel? No one had the right to judge but God and believe me we will all meet him and atone for whatever HE feels are sins. I thank God everyday for the loving people in my life who accept me and cherish me as a person. Shame on that church and the clergy that operates with such a narrow mind. Things are changing people, laws are changing and ALL people will have the same rights in my lifetime and my children will not have to deal with prejudice and ignorance. Ignorance is bred by other ignorance..(ie. slavery, segregation and bigotry), this is another form of oppression and I am ashamed to say that my church had a hand in it.
  • Allen Ewing-Merrill 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    It's funny: These are the exact comments people made when the Methodist Church began to ordain African Americans. And they did go and start their own church, too. Generations later, we realize how wrong we were. The same comments were made when the Methodist Church began to ordain women, or to allow divorced pastors to continue to serve. Decades later, we realize we were wrong. Social change is hard, and complicated, and divisive -- but when we listen carefully to the leading of the Holy Spirit, and when we allow perfect love to cast out fear, we're often surprised how God will reveal new things to us. There are many, many faithful followers of Jesus within the United Methodist Church who love the Word of God and strive to order our lives around its teachings, who want to follow God with all our hearts, who have come to a different understanding of the witness of Scripture around this issue. Like those who struggled with desegregation and the rights of women in society, we can't see all of this clearly right now, but it's pretty clear where the Spirit and social change are leading us. I know that is really painful for many who feel deeply that this change is detrimental to our church and to society, but I have a feeling one day, future generations will look back at this time in history and shake their heads. For now, in this in-between time, we see in a mirror dimly, so let's strive to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with God. And for now, I'm going to pray for truly open hearts, open minds, and open doors.
  • MarieS 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    This is sad. Just as I am sure that there are some who claim this is another case of "unjustified discrimination" and are hiding their reasoning behind "love," I am also sure there are those against homosexuality who declare themselves to be Christians, but logically cannot defend their beliefs. I am not one of them. I am a follower of Jesus Christ, and all of my views on this issue are based on reason and scripture, not emotion. Amy DeLong is using this church as a platform to belie the view she shares with a great number of people including some professing Christians, in that they think the Bible only teaches that Jesus was loving and tolerant. They apply that reasoning to homosexuality as justification for that sin. Jesus' message is NOT that he created homosexuals and therefore they are justified. His message is that he created us all to love Him and be loved by Him, but that we are all sinners - homosexuality being just one of many sins - and that unless we turn from our sins, we can have no part in that love. We should never put it out of our mind that Satan will use the church to try to destroy faith in Jesus Christ. God takes that offense very seriously. Satan gets to church before everyone else! Please make the mental connection that the world isn't asking us to be "tolerant" of thievery, lying, murder, and adultery. But homosexuality should be ok? It's in the bible, homosexuality a sin (regardless of who it is), just like the rest of the list. It's about time a church stood on the firm foundation of the Truth instead of the "feel good" version of the gospel. Good work. I will pray for the UMC-I'm sure there will be many more developments on this front.
  • Ima Guessin 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    Rather than rip our denomination apart...and also others...why don't the gays just go and start their own church and do it their own way and leave those of us that believe in the Word of God alone. I do know if this issue is accepted at the next Conference, I will be looking for a different denomination.
  • Unknown 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    Guess the UMC only wants its members to think what they are told to think and not hear when they're wrong!
  • Unknown 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    If we are the Body, why aren't His arms reaching?
  • Unknown 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    VERY insightful, Allen!
  • Pattie 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    Really? are you that ignorant of sociological findings? People are born that way. Some people choose it, yes but the majority are born that way. Go back and do more research....unbiased medical research.
  • Pattie 2 comments collapsed Collapse Expand
    Really? are you that ignorant of sociological findings? People are born that way. Some people choose it, yes but the majority are born that way. Go back and do more research....unbiased medical research.
  • Cowboy Up 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    Sociological findings? Medical Findings? Where has any research definitively been able to determine someone to be born with any sexual preference orientation? God states he made them male and female and for that reason man will leave home to be with his wife and they will become one flesh. Thats as far as the research should go.
  • HHH 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    The decision on this process makes our Book of Disciple and decades of General Conference, simply a JOKE. A person that openly admits to being a lesbian, and that will not uphold church law, is merely given 21 days of suspension. This is a sad day in our denomination - whether one agrees or not with the law in place, it is the law - shame on us UMC.
  • Ur Worstnightmare 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    It is true that a gene controlling sexual desire/orientation has not been found, but that does not mean it does not exists. Nor does your theory address epigenics. The ideas of treating gays with hormones is antiquated, and has been shown many times to not produce heterosexual tendencies.
  • Ur Worstnightmare 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    Who are we to question the love that God has given to homosexuals. They are born that way. May God have pity and mercy on them...and us.
  • johnroberts 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    Amy DeLong must really hate the UMC. I can not imagine anyone intentionally dragging this church into so much mud. Her trial should be about the church riding itself of a elder that has a heart for disorder, strife, recognition at any price, and confusion. Where are the peacemakers?
  • Martha Berry 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    Why should there be any question about her sentence. She has openly defied and disobeyed Church law and should be defrocked. If she doesn't like to adhere to the laws of our Church, then let her go to one that has no such law. It seems that most interest groups who claim they want fairness, don't want fairness but want special treatment.
  • Royce Logan 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    The Book of Discipline is quite clear. This woman is damaging the UMC and the Body of Christ with her self-centered perversions. She should be removed from the pulpit and her superiors should be examined too. That marriage she performed is not legal in the United Methodist Church and really has no Christian foundation as long as the UMC remains part of the Body of Christ. I am a sinner too and some of mine may be worse than hers, but at least I know they are sins and I know I need forgiveness and that there are limitations to what my leadership role should be in my church because of my failures. She is in the dark and doesn't see her sins. If our process fails it will severly damage our church probably forever. They better think this through carefully.
  • Tim 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    This is the result of a failure in leadership in the UMC. According to the UMC official website (www.umc.org): What is the denomination’s official policy on homosexuality? The United Methodist Church, in the 2008 Book of Discipline, states “all persons are of sacred worth.” However, the denomination regards "the practice of homosexuality as incompatible with Christian teaching.” The church forbids the ordination and appointment of “self-avowed practicing homosexuals.” It also forbids the celebration of same-sex unions by its clergy and in its sanctuaries. I have understood that homosexuals could hold no leadership role in the church. In numerous news reports it states that The United Methodist Church allows gay and lesbian clergy but only if they are celibate, and it prohibits all pastors from blessing same-sex unions. Nowhere have I found that rule stated in The Book of Discipline. Amy Delong is in direct violation of church policy and should be dismissed from the clergy. Anything less will do harm to an already fractured church.
  • Tim 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    fractured church.
  • Bob Mayer 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    Do we follow the Book of Discipline or not? When folks are ordained they say they will uphold it are they lying if they say yes and do whatever they want? Isn't this a chargeable offense? No matter how you feel about this situation, this is a chargeable offense. If there are no consequences then we might as well throw the BOD out completely.
  • Unknown 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    Homosexuality Dena Bodian http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/e... It is a proven fact there is no "gay chromosome". A fetus that receives too much or too little testosterone can display behavior opposite of their birth gender. With treatment, birth gender characteristics are restored and normal activity ensues. The constitution clearly states that we each have unalienable rights granted to us by our Creator. All men (people) are created equal. There is nothing in the constitution about group rights, and wisely so. However, today's officeholders (vs: representatives of the people) have formed a vast movement not only tearing away from the constitution but seemingly launch great efforts to destroy it. Homosexuals who force their group agenda and those sympathetic to them are in violation of the law of the land, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES. I am French, English, German and Native American. Which makes me a Fegna. Or perhaps I should say Fegna-American to be "politically" correct. Shall I form a group and demand that all text books be re-written to tell about the impact that Fegna-Americans had in developing the United States? Should the curriculum be restructured to suit the Fegna's demands, rantings, ravings and parades? Should Fegnas be included in television programming and commercials to make sure everyone knows It's okay to be a Fegna and that you must change to make us happy? Absolutely NOT. Why? Because in this country we ALL have the right to life, liberty and to pursue happiness as we each see fit. Not as some group sees fit. Allowing homosexual marriage, etc. was a hot topic at conference. One young man spoke and he hit the nail right on the head when he said: We welcome the alcohol into church, but we don't offer him a beer. We welcome the prostitute into our church, but not with her appointment book. We welcome the homosexuals into our church when they repent, get help, and sin no more. You can't have it both ways. If the Methodist Church changes the status on homosexuality I will resign as certified laity and as a member of this faith.
  • Al McGowen 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    Look at her history: She clearly held to these positions for some time; furthermore her "superiors" (in violation of Sacred Scripture, Traditions of the UMC and it's Discipline, clear data demonstrating that persons of homosexual orientation and practice can indeed experience being transformed, and reasonable understanding of 2000 years of church history) continued to allow her to serve... Allowing her to openly or privately do so is the greater travesty. Why not put them on trial?
  • iptl4evr 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    I am praying that the jury will judge based on what the Book of Discipline says, not on what the want it to say. To rule according to their bias and agenda will be devastating to the church.
  • Nick 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    As disciples of Jesus Christ, and for some as pastors/preachers, we must obey God rather thn men; and, in the case of knowing whether to obey God rather than men, should we not stand on Gods's Word as revealed in Scripture and in Jesus Christ, the Living Word? God says homosexuality is an abomination and not part of His Will as revealewd in creation.
  • Creed Pogue 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    This is really another attempt at jury nullification. Rev. DeLong, of her own accord, came forward to say that she is in a same-sex relationship and that she officiated at a same-sex union ceremony. Usually, when you admit to the offense, the only question is the penalty and that is clear in the Discipline. Here, the jury is being asked to disregard the Discipline.
  • cdoscher 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    I don't understand why there is a trial if she admits openly to the offenses!
  • bjsura1 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    As a United Methodist Christian, I believe that we should follow in the path of John Wesley and be inclusionary instead of exclusionary. There, but for the grace of God, go I. Are we not ALL born in the image of God and in his faith as practicing Christians? Can we choose to be different than we are because of prejudice and fear of those who have trouble accepting anyone different than them - in color, in dress, in love? Why do we continue to define people by their differances than in the ways they are alike us? Why do we feel that we have a right to judge others when we hope and pray that our judge will be God and he will be merciful. Who are we to deny the privilege of loving relationships, something we all want, to someone who needs that love from a person of the same sex? Who made us God? I am reminded of a good Christian friend, a librarian, who informed that that the Harry Potter books were of witchcraft and delvitry based on what she had heard. She had not read any of the books, but knew they were bad. I went a bought the first book and read it myself to form my own opinion and found nothing that justified the condemning of the books, their author, or the stories. Later on, when better informed, my friend told me that she had been wrong andd that the books were OK. I will agree with one writer here. There was no need for a trial and the pastor had been honest with her superintendent. I wouod venture to say that the trial was pushed forward by some rightous person or persons who could not understand the pastor's love for those who were forced to live "in sin" because of the prejudices of other "Christians." I don't remember the New Testament adressing the sexuality of love or the condemning of anyone by Christ for whom they loved. Unless we are discussing the "assumptions of some about what Paul/Saul's pain was about. And that was an agony that was not imposed by Christ. In case you are wondering, I am a 73 year old heterosexual who has lived long enough to accept that I am not perfect and that God did not give me the right to dismiss others for who they are as practising Christians. Whether I agree with everything they do or believe is immaterial.
  • Clark Neal 1 comment collapsed Collapse Expand
    Not only should DeLong be removed from her clergy position but all the people who accepted her as an elder should be required to resign as they also violated the Book of Discipline. The Book of Discipline is the constitution of the UMC, in unambiguous terms it states that no one shall be ordained who is a practicing homosexual and no ordained person of the church shall conduct a marriage of a same-sex couple. There is no way an honest person committed to upholding the Book of Discipline would find in favor of DeLong's position. To do so would be to render the Book of Discipline null and void and release all churches and members from any obligation to submit themselves to the authority of the Book of Discipline. No provision of the Book of Discipline would be enforceable as the court would have replaced the authority of the Conferences by their own subversive agenda. The Bible and the Book of Discipline are fully and clearly aligned on the sin that exists in sexual relations outside of the marriage of a man and a woman - do not tamper with God's law.

Ask Now

This will not reach a local church, district or conference office. InfoServ* staff will answer your question, or direct it to someone who can provide information and/or resources.

Phone
(optional)

*InfoServ ( about ) is a ministry of United Methodist Communications located in Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 1-800-251-8140

Not receiving a reply?
Your Spam Blocker might not recognize our email address. Add this address to your list of approved senders.

Would you like to ask any questions about this story?ASK US NOW