United Methodist bishops affirm church membership
open to all
|
Bishop Janice K. Riggle Huie |
Bishop Janice K. Riggle Huie |
Nov. 3, 2005
By Tim Tanton*
LAKE JUNALUSKA, N.C. (UMNS) — Homosexuality is not a barrier to membership in
the United Methodist Church, the denomination’s bishops said Nov. 2, two days
after the church’s top court supported a pastor’s refusal to allow a gay man to
join.
“While pastors have the responsibility to discern readiness for membership,
homosexuality is not a barrier,” the bishops said in their pastoral letter to
the people of the United Methodist Church.
In a ruling announced Oct. 31, the Judicial Council supported the Rev. Ed
Johnson of South Hill (Va.) United Methodist Church in his decision not to allow
a gay man to join his congregation. The man was a choir member and had been
meeting with Johnson about transferring membership from another denomination.
Johnson was placed on a yearlong involuntary leave of absence by fellow
pastors during the clergy session of the Virginia Annual (regional) Conference
last June. The Judicial Council upheld Johnson’s action, citing the authority
given to clergy by the church’s Book of Discipline. The court ordered
that the pastor be reinstated to his previous status.
The ripple effect of the court’s decision was felt immediately in Lake
Junaluska, where the Council of Bishops is holding its weeklong fall meeting.
The council spent at least four hours in closed session working on a statement
responding to the ruling.
“With the Social Principles of the United Methodist Church, we affirm ?that
God’s grace is available to all, and we will seek to live together in Christian
community,’” the bishops said, quoting from the Social Principles in the Book
of Discipline. “?We implore families and churches not to reject or condemn
lesbian and gay members and friends. We commit ourselves to be in ministry for
and with all persons.’
“We also affirm our Wesleyan practice that pastors are accountable to the
bishop, superintendent and the clergy on matters of ministry and membership,”
the bishops said.
|
Bishop Peter D. Weaver |
The Council of Bishops unanimously adopted the pastoral letter in closed
session.
The announcement of the court’s ruling caused “considerable conversation
within the council,” said Bishop Janice Riggle Huie, who led the seven-bishop
writing team that worked on the statement. Huie oversees the church’s Texas
Annual (regional) Conference.
Many of the bishops had received calls and e-mail from pastors and lay people
in their conferences who were “greatly troubled” by the ruling and were asking
for clarification, she told United Methodist News Service.
“We wanted our response to be thoughtful, prayerful and to speak to the
church,” she said.
As the bishops worked on the statement, it became clear that there was unity
within the council regarding the membership of gays in the United Methodist
Church, she said. “I don’t think it’s going too far to say the council is of one
mind that gay and lesbian people can be members of the United Methodist Church.”
The Book of Discipline affirms homosexuals as people “of sacred
worth.” It also holds the practice of homosexuality incompatible with Christian
teaching, and it bars the performance of same-sex unions by the church’s clergy
and in the church’s sanctuaries.
During oral hearings before the Judicial Council Oct. 27, the Rev. Tom Thomas
of Virginia, speaking for Johnson, argued that the pastor “drew the line not at
the homosexual person but at homosexual practice.” Johnson, who was at the
hearing, did not address the court.
Virginia Bishop Charlene Kammerer defended the suspension of Johnson, stating
that the Constitution emphasizes inclusiveness and not exclusiveness, and that
only allowing participation in the church “amounts to second-class citizenship.”
In their pastoral letter, the bishops said they “uphold and affirm” that the
church’s top legislative body, the General Conference, “has clearly spoken
through the denomination’s Constitution on inclusiveness and justice for all as
it relates to church membership.”
The bishops cited the Constitution’s declaration that all people shall be
eligible to attend the church’s worship services, participate in its programs,
receive the sacraments, be admitted as baptized members, “and upon taking the
vows declaring the Christian faith, become professing members in any local
church in the connection.”
“The invitation that this (Judicial Council) ruling gives to all of us is to
think carefully about the meaning of United Methodist membership,” said Bishop
Peter Weaver, president of the council and leader of the church’s New England
Conference.
The ruling provides an opportunity “to think about how we are inclusive of
persons who are in our communities and how we make disciples of Jesus Christ for
the transformation of the world,” he said. Making disciples is a theme of the
bishops’ fall meeting and their focus for 2005-08. Weaver noted that earlier on
Nov. 2, the council had heard a major presentation on evangelism by a Duke
Divinity School theologian.
Regarding a pastor’s authority to make decisions about membership, Weaver
said: “The local pastor does have authority, but it’s in the context of the
theology and values of the United Methodist Church.”
The bishops will discuss other possible responses to the ruling as their
meeting continues, he said. The meeting, which began Oct. 30, ends Nov. 4.
Weaver is already responding in his own New England Conference by setting up
four regional opportunities for Christian conversation about the Judicial
Council ruling.
The Council of Bishops comprises the top clergy leaders in the nearly 11
million-member United Methodist Church. The council has 69 active bishops and
about 100 retired bishops from the United States, Africa, Europe and the
Philippines.
*Tanton is managing editor for United Methodist News Service.
News media contact: Tim Tanton, Nashville, Tenn., (615) 742-5470 or
newsdesk@umcom.org.
Video
Interview with Bishop Janice Huie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|