Commentary: Debate About ‘Passion’ Reveals Media Shortcomings By Rev. Larry Hollon (UMCom)
-- The voice on the telephone explained that the movie “The Passion of
The Christ” is generating great interest around the country. Surely the
male voice said, The United Methodist Church would want to be a part of a
remarkable event—the showing of the movie during Lent. If we would
enter into a marketing agreement with his company, we could sell out
theaters around the country and share in the benefits, including a
portion of the take. He said he was sure we would want to be a part of this event, and his offer was so generous there was no reason to refuse. His closing remark was ominous. If we failed to take a stand in support of the movie, the world would know. “The
world would know what?” I wondered. That we are less than Christian if
we do not sell the tickets? Or more faithful if we do? How silly. I
do not believe this movie is a litmus test of faith, or a precursor to
sweeping religious revival, as some claim. But it is a cultural event.
The debate swirling around it reveals both a frustrating and disturbing
element of our culture. That element is the tendency to reduce an issue
to black-or-white simplicity and to choose sides to debate either/or
propositions. As I watched CNN recently, I saw two men debate the
content of the movie. Superimposed on the screen was the caption:
“Faithful to the Gospels or Demonization of Jews?” Framing
issues large and small into polar opposites has become a common
practice among journalists. This practice makes it difficult to
comprehend stories fully and in-depth. | This
is an example of the mainstream media doing what it does so well:
framing a story by its polar extremes, selecting persons on the extreme
to debate each other and generating heat but precious little light. Framing
issues large and small into polar opposites has become a common
practice among journalists. This practice makes it difficult to
comprehend stories fully and in-depth. We deserve better. In the case of
“The Passion of The Christ,” commentators limit our options on how we
can feel about the movie. We have been told it will be either a
powerfully moving experience illuminating the sacrifice of Jesus, or it
will lead to bashing Jews. Understanding
that this is how journalism is practiced today, the movie’s marketers
have exploited it from the beginning. It has been an effective
arrangement for both the commercial media and the moviemakers because it
has brought eyeballs to the tube and has sold tickets to the movie. It
does not advance the public dialogue, and I believe it is dangerous.
When the gatekeepers of commercial media frame the issues in polar
opposites, they allow the agenda to be set by those at the extremes
where division, alienation and anger reside. In a frightened and divided
world, the middle ground between the extremes could be the place where
dialogue occurs that leads to understanding, sensitivity and respect,
all of which are necessary to help us build community. The voices in the
middle are rarely heard and the issues are framed between
irreconcilable opposites. The
movie, of course, is Mel Gibson’s vision of the Passion. As with every
work of art, it will represent his understanding. Therefore, as the
scholars on this Web site suggest, it is important to understand the context in which this work is made and in which it appears. For
many in the audience, this may be as close to Bible study as they will
ever get, and the movie will leave an indelible impression upon them
about a central issue in the Christian faith. | It
does make a difference that the movie is as faithful to the gospel
accounts as possible, and that it will not be a pretext for latent
anti-Semitism. For many in the audience, this may be as close to Bible
study as they will ever get, and the movie will leave an indelible
impression upon them about a central issue in the Christian faith. We
have a right to expect an accurate portrayal of Jesus’ sacrifice.Moreover,
we must take care to understand how cultural expressions affect us. The
role of Passion plays contributing to anti-Semitism that led to
genocide in Europe is no small concern. We would do well to remember
that barely three years ago “hate radio” in Rwanda stirred rampaging
gangs of Hutus to seek out and destroy Tutsis by the hundreds of
thousands. We must have reasoned and informed discussion. The
manipulation of cultural icons by those bent on destroying the human
community is too great a threat to leave to the pandering producers of
television talk shows, some of whom seem to lack even the most basic
understanding of respect for human dignity. Civil discourse is fundamental to a free society. It is possible for an intelligent, thinking person to be both moved and inspired by this portrayal of Christ's Passion and at the same time, be concerned about the anxiety this film raises among Jews. The
United Methodist tradition calls us beyond an "either-or" logic. It
calls us to have open hearts and open minds. Ours is a tradition that
melds faith, experience, reason, and Scripture. I believe we are called
to inhabit the middle ground between the extremes and to probe more
deeply than the superficial coverage of much of mainstream media. This
movie event is about more than what you are currently hearing. It can
be about how it is possible to feel both deeply moved and deeply
concerned. It is about thoughtful, faithful study of Scripture. It can
be about how people of faith inhabit the middle ground of sensitivity,
respect for others, faithfulness and reconciliation. Do not look for
that on CNN. The
Rev. Larry Hollon is General Secretary of United Methodist
Communications, Nashville, Tenn. Before assuming his current position,
he was an award-winning documentary producer.
|