|Church court: Structural changes require legislation
The Judicial Council of The United Methodist Church,
including five new members elected last spring by General Conference,
met in Bloomington, Minn., for its first session of the denomination's
new four-year period.
A UMNS file photo by Neill Caldwell.
By Neill Caldwell*
Oct. 29, 2008 | BLOOMINGTON, Minn. (UMNS)
The top court of The United Methodist Church has ruled that the
denomination’s legislative body would need to enact enabling legislation
in 2012 to change the church's structure in the United States.
The Judicial Council, meeting Oct. 22-25 in its first session since
the election of five new members last spring, also remanded two cases on
key issues—church membership and same-gender marriages—back to their
respective conferences, citing an absence of official documentation
needed to decide the cases.
The denomination has been studying its structure to reflect the
increasing global nature of the church, and it brought proposed
constitutional changes before its top legislative body last spring. The
2008 General Conference mandated creation of a regional conference in
the United States as part of its efforts to make the denomination less
U.S.-centric in structure and has sent the amendment to annual
conferences for a vote in 2009 as part of the ratification process.
Delegates consider legislation during the 2008 United Methodist General Conference in Fort Worth, Texas.
A UMNS file photo by Mike DuBose.
The Judicial Council, however, said the amendment does nothing to "harmonize its content" with the rest of the Book of Discipline, the denomination's book of law, and that enabling legislation is necessary.
In responding to a request for a ruling of law brought from the floor
of General Conference about the amendment's meaning, application and
effect, the council clarified that the structural changes could not take
effect before 2012, even if ratified at the annual conference level in
"We conclude that the General Conference did not intend … to create a
regional conference in the United States before the next General
Conference," Decision 1100 states.
Holy Communion, local pastors
The council rejected two changes to the Book of Discipline approved by General Conference when the worldwide assembly met last spring in Fort Worth, Texas.
The first was designed to make it easier for laity to distribute Holy Communion in remote areas.
Responding to questions of constitutionality from the Western North
Carolina Conference, the council said that amendments made to Paragraph
1117.9 create a doctrine of "reserved sacrament" and alters the Discipline
without proper authority. The church’s Articles of Religion explicitly
say that the sacraments are not to be "reserved" or "carried about."
In Decision 1109, the council said it would "not become the arbiter
of theological debates" and that the amendments create "a fundamental
shift in the way that the Church talks about the elements of the
Sacrament of Holy Communion."
"It is quite permissible for The United Methodist Church to change
its doctrine regarding Holy Communion," states Decision 1109. "But the
means for doing so is not to act on a petition by a simple majority of
the General Conference. Rather, the proper procedure is akin to that for
amending the Constitution, except for the provision that a larger
aggregate vote of the annual conferences—three-fourths—must be achieved.
An argument from expediency, to make it easier for laity in remote
areas to receive the sacrament, does not abrogate the Church’s methods
for changing its doctrine."
The second General Conference change rejected by the council offered
local pastors the option of choosing their status as lay or clergy if
they have completed the Course of Study but are no longer under
appointment. In Decision 1101, the council said the legislation is in
direct violation of the Discipline, including Paragraph 32 of the Constitution, which lists the criteria for being a pastor.
"Retired local pastors are not clergy and may not vote as clergy
during annual conference," the decision states. "Nowhere in the Book of Discipline does the local pastor have the opportunity to determine his or her status."
That status, the council said, is determined by the district
committee on ordained ministry and the conference board of ordained
ministry. Ruling the new Paragraph 320.6 null and void, the court said
the original petition was "fatally flawed" because a local pastor is
only considered clergy when under appointment and resumes lay status
when not appointed.
Lack of documentation
Two much-anticipated decisions were deferred because the proper
annual conference minutes had not been submitted to the Judicial
One involved a resolution passed by the California-Nevada Annual
Conference in June commending a group of 80 retired United Methodist
clergy who had offered to perform same-sex marriages in the wake of a
California Supreme Court ruling legalizing such unions. The Discipline
forbids United Methodist pastors from performing same-sex marriage
ceremonies. Responding to a request for a ruling of law on the
conference action, Bishop Beverly Shamana ruled in July that the
resolution "steps over a Disciplinary line" and declared the statement
"void and of no effect."
Bishop Beverly Shamana
The other involved a question over church membership in the Alaska
Conference. While conference lay leader Lonnie Brooks offered oral
arguments to the court in behalf of the conference, the council said
"the record supplied is insufficient in that it fails to provide an
exact statement of the entire question submitted for declaratory
decision." The Alaska case will be added to the spring 2009 docket.
Under the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Council,
the secretary of an annual conference is responsible for providing the
council's secretary with materials related to the matter being appealed,
including a copy of the minutes where the matter arose.
The council also cited a lack of official minutes in deferring a case
from the West Ohio Conference related to its inter-jurisdictional
committee on the episcopacy.
The council held oral arguments in a case in which members of the
Kansas East Annual Conference sought to amend seven paragraphs of the Discipline by eliminating specific language related to homosexuality.
A conference task force crafted a "comprehensive petition" passed by
the 2007 Kansas East Annual Conference. But the petition was later
divided into five separate General Conference petitions to meet the rule
in Paragraph 507.2, which states that "each petition must address only
one paragraph of the Discipline, except that if two or more paragraphs of the Discipline are so closely related that a change in one affects the others."
"The church needs guidance for how petitions can be written and
processed," said Barbara Luckert of the Kansas East Conference, speaking
during oral arguments. "There is presently no clear mechanism available
for General Conference to process petitions addressing multiple
paragraphs in the Book of Discipline."
In Decision 1108, the council disagreed, saying that such a mechanism
is already in place. It ruled it proper for the secretary of General
Conference to determine when Paragraph 507.2 is applicable, and that a
common theme or topic "will not achieve the threshold necessary to
permit embracing them in a single petition. … A petitioner who seeks a
'comprehensive' approach to various legislative changes may do so by
submitting multiple petitions with a rationale for each."
The Judicial Council also:
- Ruled that a pastor who is acquitted in a church trial is
entitled to restoration of all previous status, rights and privileges.
The Eastern Pennsylvania Conference case involved a clergy member
accused of child abuse at a church preschool. The pastor was found
innocent by a church court but was not appointed because he could not
provide child abuse clearance verification. Because the pastor remained
an elder in good standing, he was required to be appointed, the council
said in Decision 1105, and could only be deprived of an appointment by
the fair process described in the Discipline. A concurring
opinion signed by council members Angela Brown, Kathy Austin-Mahle and
Susan Henry-Crowe supported the decision but expressed unease at the
lack of a "clear, expunged record" that would compromise the pastor’s
"ministry, appointability and relationship with the annual conference."
Belton Joyner wrote a dissenting opinion stating, "I believe that an
annual conference can establish requirements for professional
responsibilities other than those delineated in Paragraph 334.2 and thus
create additional conditions for continued eligibility."
- Offered a mixed ruling on an item from the
California-Pacific Conference that asked multiple questions related to
procedures used to discontinue the probationary membership of a
transitional deacon. The council said that a hearing before a board of
ordained ministry’s executive committee does not constitute an appeal
but is part of the board’s process. The council also said that Paragraph
318 of the 1996 Discipline, which was being used in this matter,
calls for a three-fourths vote of the board of ordained ministry, but
only a simple majority vote in the clergy session. On a third question,
the council said that it did not have jurisdiction.
- Affirmed a decision of law by Baltimore-Washington
Conference Bishop John R. Schol that nominations for the board of
ordained ministry come from the presiding bishop after consultation with
the board’s chairperson, according to Paragraph 634.1a, and cannot be
offered from the floor of annual conference or other sources.
- Said it had no jurisdiction in two questions about
decisions of law by Pacific Northwest Bishop Edward Paup and East Ohio
Bishop John L. Hopkins because neither bishop actually made a decision
The Judicial Council is scheduled to meet next April 22-25 in Denver.
*Caldwell is editor of the Virginia United Methodist Advocate magazine and covers the Judicial Council for United Methodist News Service.
News media contact: Marta Aldrich, Nashville, Tenn., (615) 742-5470 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Judicial Council defers two ruling requests from General Conference
Assembly creates new study group on church structure
Bishop rules Cal-Nevada statement on same-sex unions 'void'
Judicial Council hires former member as first clerk
Judicial Council elects first woman president
Five new members are elected to Judicial Council
General Conference 2008