Individual bishops voice disappointment at verdict
Individual bishops voice disappointment at verdict
March 26, 2004
A UMNS Feature By Linda Green*
Bishop Timothy Wayne Whitaker
Bishop Timothy Wayne Whitaker
Bishops
from around the United Methodist Church are stepping forward to
reaffirm their support for the denomination's book of laws following the
controversial acquittal of a lesbian pastor during a clergy trial.
In
individual statements, many bishops are also emphasizing to church
members in their areas that the United Methodist positions on
homosexuality have not changed. The executive committee of the church's
Council of Bishops is expected to issue a more collective statement
about the verdict March 26.
The
Rev. Karen Dammann was found not guilty of "practices declared by the
United Methodist Church to be incompatible with Christian teachings"
after a March 17-20 trial in Bothell, Wash. A panel of 13 fellow clergy
from the church's Pacific Northwest Annual (regional) Conference cleared
her, with 11 jurors voting not guilty and the remaining two undecided.
After
the verdict was announced, U.S. bishops from coast to coast addressed
their parishioners who, like them, were experiencing a multitude of
emotions: anger, disappointment, betrayal, celebration, joy, denial and
confusion.
The
verdict was the action of one group in one place at one specific time,
and it did not represent the position of the church as a whole, several
bishops wrote.
Bishop Linda Lee
Bishop Linda Lee
General
Conference, the only body that speaks officially for the United
Methodist Church, has addressed issues surrounding homosexuality for
decades. In the denomination's Book of Discipline, General Conference
holds the practice of homosexuality "incompatible with Christian
teachings," though affirming homosexuals as people of sacred worth.
"I
believe it is essential that in the midst of such reactions, the United
Methodist Church must remain steadfast and faithful to scriptural
and theological grounding," said Indiana Bishop Woodie White to the
state's United Methodists.
In
a statement to Alabama-West Florida United Methodists, Bishop Larry
Goodpaster noted that although a contingent in the denomination would
like to change some of the church's proscriptions against homosexuality,
"that does not mean that anyone can set the Discipline aside in favor
of their own preferences."
He
said he would pray for God's guidance and "also continue to support and
uphold the Book of Discipline as I understand its clear direction
concerning these matters." He called upon United Methodists of the
Alabama-West Florida Annual Conference "to be fervent in prayer,
gracious in conversation, and committed to making a difference for the
sake of Jesus Christ and the glory of God."
White
and Michigan Area Bishop Linda Lee said the verdict shows that United
Methodists are not of one mind in understanding the complexities
surrounding homosexuality and the theological grounding of the church.
Bishop Neil L. Irons
Bishop Neil L. Irons
The
decision "sheds light on how different people understand the
Discipline," Lee said. "I believe that the most important thing we can
do as Christians and as United Methodists, is to hold fast to the truth
that 'there is no longer Jew or Greek.' ... The issue of homosexuality
is an issue that the members of the United Methodist Church may never
come to agreement about. I do not believe we are required to do so. But,
we do need to agree that Jesus Christ makes us one in his spirit," she
said.
California-Pacific
Bishop Mary Ann Swenson noted that the history of Christian community
has been marked by fear, and today is no different. The verdict in the
Dammann trial shows that "we fear the loss of certainty, of clear gender
roles; we fear different definitions of what it means to be faithful,
to be called, to be married," she said. "In all of these, we reveal our
fear of the future. In fear, we cling to our past - not the best of our
heritage, but rather those things which justify our fear, not our
growth."
The
trial and the verdict are not a cause for fear, celebration or
division, she told church members in her area. "They are the results of
our struggling to grow in faith, to move into God's future."
In
a joint statement, Georgia Bishops Lindsey Davis and Mike Watson
expressed support for the Book of Discipline and disappointment in the
acquittal.
"It
is a clear sign of rebellion when a group chooses to flagrantly ignore
the Discipline, substituting their own perspective for the corporate
wisdom of the General Conference," they said.
North
Carolina Bishop Marion Edwards agreed, saying he "finds it
incomprehensible that a clergy jury can place itself above the law of
the church."
The
decision suggests that the trial court "may have been trying the
position of the church and not the pastor charged," said Central
Pennsylvania Bishop Neil Irons. He wrote that if his interpretation is
accurate, the court failed to abide by the Book of Discipline and the
verdict represents "a serious challenge to the order of the church,
which every ordained United Methodist pastor has agreed to uphold."
Bishop Mary Ann Swenson
Bishop Mary Ann Swenson
Davis,
Watson, Virginia Bishop Joe Pennel and Tennessee Bishop William Morris
are calling upon the delegates to the 2004 General Conference to arrive
in Pittsburgh ready to discuss the verdict and consider a response
supporting the connectional covenant. The assembly, which gathers every
four years, will meet April 27-May 7.
"It
is my persistent and fervent prayer that the lay and clergy delegates
to the upcoming General Conference will find a way to be redemptive
while holding steadfast to that which affirms the highest standards of
sexual expression," Pennel said. He also said he hopes General
Conference finds a way to "hold this jury accountable for its
misinterpretation of our Book of Discipline."
The
verdict is testing the unity of the church in a new way, said Florida
Bishop Timothy Whitaker. A breach of the connectional covenant by one
part of the church does not destroy it for the entire church, but it
could have repercussions, he said.
One
violation of the covenant does not amount to schism in the church, nor
should schism be a serious danger at this time, he wrote. Nevertheless,
the breach "does create anxiety among United Methodists that in the
future there could be a breakdown of the order and discipline of the
United Methodist Church, which might result in a schism of the visible
and physical unity of the church."
Bishop D. Max Whitfield
Bishop D. Max Whitfield
Northwest
Texas Bishop Max Whitfield said his initial reaction to the verdict was
a "less-than-complimentary" emotional explosion, but he also noted that
the United Methodist Church is still in place and he remains confident
about the church's future.
God's
spirit will guide and direct those elected from around the world to
appropriately respond, Whitfield said. "Speculating on what that
guidance and response is does not advance the kingdom of God," he said.
"However, I remain confident God works in our lives and in the church. I
wait with anticipation for God's gift prepared for us at General
Conference."
Pennel
requests that United Methodists remember that those on both sides of
"this vexing issue" are God's children, and should be treated with
respect and reverence.
"This
issue must not cause us to lose our central focus, which is to make
disciples," he wrote. "We must stay focused on worship, nurture,
missions and evangelism. To be distracted by this one verdict, rather
than to be called by our primary mission, is the greater evil."
*Green
is a United Methodist News Service news writer based in Nashville,
Tenn. News media can contact Linda Green at (615) 742-5470 or newsdesk@umcom.org.