U.S. conferences disapprove structure proposal
Youth
and young adult members of the United Methodist Florida Annual
Conference cast their votes on the 32 amendments approved at the 2008
General Conference.
A UMNS photo by Caryl Kelley.
|
A UMNS Report
By Linda Green and Elizabeth Guye*
July 29, 2009
United Methodists in the U.S. have largely voted against 23 proposed
amendments that would change the structure of the church, but voting is
ongoing in Africa, Europe and the Philippines.
The amendments, proposed as changes to the denomination’s constitution,
would pave the way for making the U.S. church one of several regional
bodies around the world.
During U.S. annual conference sessions in May and June, church members
also voted against an amendment to make membership in the church open
to everyone without regard to sexual orientation.
Forty-four of the 62 U.S. conferences reported the results of their
amendment votes to Newscope and United Methodist News Service as part
of their annual wrap-ups of conference action. Eighteen conferences did
not report their results on the amendments.
The church has 73 conferences in Africa, the Philippines and Europe.
Since they hold their annual meetings at different times throughout the
year, the final outcome of the voting won’t be known until spring 2010.
The 2008 United Methodist General Conference, the denomination’s top
legislative body, approved 32 amendments to the church’s constitution.
For a proposed amendment to be ratified, two-thirds of the aggregate
number of voting annual conference members must approve.
The worldwide votes will be ratified by the Council of Bishops when it
meets May 2-6, 2010, in Columbus, Ohio. Official results will be
announced then.
Bishop Gregory Palmer, president of the Council of Bishops, noted all
annual conferences have not voted. He also said the council office
where the reports are being sent has not done any tally at this point
and will not be doing any until the receipt of all conference reports.
“When the tally is done, it will be reported to the council and an
announcement will be made during the council's spring meeting,” Palmer
said.
Votes on global plan
About 60 percent of U.S. conferences reporting voting results
defeated the 23 amendments dealing with the worldwide church proposal.
The amendments, proposed by the Task Force on the Worldwide Nature of
the Church, would allow the organizing of regional conferences around
the globe to create a uniform United Methodist church structure. The
legislation would have made it possible to create a U.S. regional
conference in the future.
Kansas Bishop Scott Jones, chairperson of the task force exploring the
global nature of the church and proponent of the 23 constitutional
amendments, said the results are incomplete because many conferences
outside the United States have not voted. Once the voting is finished,
church leaders should study carefully what the results mean, he said.
Whether the amendments are approved, the work of the study committee
will go forward with the mandate that the General Conference gave it,
he said.
“It takes the General Conference a long time to absorb a really big
idea and the issues which gave rise to these proposals and need good
answers,” Jones explained. “I fully expect the General Conference of
2012 to revisit these issues and move them forward.”
Those opposing the amendments applauded the early votes.
The Rev. Eddie Fox, world director of evangelism for the World
Methodist Council, said the democratic process worked. “It is a very
serious matter when we change the constitution,” he said.
Fox, whose office is based in Nashville, Tenn., believes the 23
amendments were confusing and had no clear plan or rationale for the
constitutional change. “I am deeply grateful for this decision by the
members of our church, which I believe have prevented us from taking an
action which would have resulted in moving us away from the core values
of the connection and setting us on a path of having national
churches,” he said.
He called for a renewed focus on how to strengthen the worldwide connection of the entire Methodist movement.
“I pray that our vision, passion and concern will be on how the world
Methodist communion can do its part in spreading the good news of
Christ Jesus in a world which desperately needs healing, hope and
salvation,” Fox added.
The Rev. Timothy McClendon, a member of the denomination's Connectional
Table, said the apparent defeat of the 23 constitutional amendments on
the church’s structure “is a vote for connectionalism.”
McClendon, a district superintendent in Columbia, S.C., believes the
proposed structure would create more divisions in the denomination,
rather than uniting it. The church, he pointed out, has an opportunity
over the next four years to create better legislation that defines who
United Methodists are, honors differences and remains connectional.
Remaining amendments
The remaining nine amendments cover such issues as church and
conference membership, annual and jurisdictional conference
composition, and inclusiveness.
Proposed Amendment 1, on the inclusiveness of the church, failed to
receive the two-thirds support in 27 of the 44 conferences reporting
results. The amendment would make all people, upon declaring a
relationship to Jesus Christ, “eligible to become professing members in
any local church in the connection.” Forty conferences voted against
Amendment 8, which would have added the word “gender” to categories of
church membership.
In 2005, a Virginia clergyman stirred conflict after he refused to
receive a homosexual man into membership, saying the man would neither
repent nor seek to live a different lifestyle. The pastor was placed on
a leave of absence by the bishop. The Judicial Council ruled in October
2005 that United Methodist pastors have authority to decide who becomes
a member of a local church and reinstated the pastor. That case
triggered appeals to the Judicial Council, but the court declined to
reconsider its ruling.
Among other amendments, proposed Amendment 19 -- which would extend to
provisional members and certain local pastors the right to vote for
clergy delegates to the General and jurisdictional conferences --
received substantial support from 26 annual conferences.
An amendment ensuring a minimum base of annual conference delegates for
the election of bishops at jurisdictional conference was approved by 37
annual conferences.
Twenty-six conferences affirmed Amendment 2, which requires all
churchwide agencies and constituencies to adopt ethics and conflict of
interest policies.
*Green is a United Methodist News Service news writer based in
Nashville, Tenn. Guye was an intern for United Methodist News Service
and the Media Group at United Methodist Communications.
News media contact: Linda Green, Nashville, Tenn., (615) 742-5470 or newsdesk@umcom.org.
Related Articles
Palmer Issues Letter to United Methodists About Amendments
Economy causes tightening of conference budgets
Conferences to consider church structure
Wrap-up: Constitutional amendments, Gates speech and resolutions on variety of issues top agenda
United Methodists explore church's global structure
Annual conferences see youth, diversity as priorities
Resources
2008 Constitutional Amendments
United Methodist Church Structure and Organization
Annual Conference Reports
Find annual conference offices
Comments will be moderated. Please see our Comment Policy for more information.
Comment Policy |
We invite you to join the dialogue. Share your comments.
Post a comment