United Methodist high court to meet in Philippines
A UMNS Report by Neill Caldwell*
Feb. 5, 2007
The highest court of The United Methodist Church has a relatively
short docket of 10 items - including reconsidering its complex decision
on General Conference representation for the African nation of Cote
d'Ivoire - but its meeting place may be the most significant aspect of
this spring's session.
The Judicial Council will convene April 25-28 in Manila, Philippines,
in the body's first meeting in history outside the United States.
As The United Methodist Church grows globally, various church bodies
have held more meetings overseas. In recent months, for example, both
its Council of Bishops and its Commission on Communications have met in
Africa.
The upcoming Judicial Council meeting location stems from the 2000
election to the court of Rodolfo C. Beltran, an attorney from Cabanatuan
City, Philippines. The first person from outside the United States to
serve on the council, Beltran invited his colleagues to meet in the
Philippines.
Two items on the spring docket come from the Philippine Central
Conference. The first asks about clergy membership in an annual
conference as it relates to the Central Conferences, which lie outside
the United States. The second concerns the authority of a bishop when
serving as a member of the board of a university.
On another international question, the Judicial Council will revisit
its fall 2006 decision regarding the number of delegates that the
Methodist Church of Cote D'Ivoire (Ivory Coast) can send to the 2008
General Conference, the denomination's top legislative body. Meeting in
Cincinnati, the council let stand the 2004 General Conference vote to
give Cote D'Ivoire just two delegates to the 2008 General Conference,
set for April 23-May 2 in Fort Worth, Texas.
The representation deviates from the formula for representation outlined in the 2004 Book of Discipline
which, if followed, would entitle the new African conference to as many
as 70 delegates, making it the largest delegation at General
Conference. If the General Conference sticks to its ceiling of 1,000
delegates, the size of other delegations would have to be reduced.
That issue remains in the air, however. In Cincinnati, a majority of
four of the seven Judicial Council members present voted to hold the
General Conference action unconstitutional. However, Paragraph 2608 of
the Book of Discipline requires a minimum of six votes to "declare any act of the General Conference unconstitutional."
In a dissenting opinion, the four council members - Beltran, Dennis
Blackwell, Keith Boyette and Jim Holsinger - stated that the 2004 vote
"denies a fully functioning annual conference duly created by the
actions of the 2004 General Conference and the West Africa Central
Conference its proportionate representation amongst the delegates to the
2008 General Conference. The General Conference, and now this Judicial
Council, has acted in a way which substantially disenfranchises what
statistically is the largest annual conference in The United Methodist
Church."
One item left over from the council's fall meeting is a request from
the United Methodist Commission on Religion and Race regarding the
merger of the National United Methodist Native American Center with the
Native American Comprehensive Plan. The commission seeks to reverse that
move, which was recommended by the United Methodist Council on Finance
and Administration. Its appeal is supported by the board of the Native
American Comprehensive Plan.
Also on the spring docket, the council is asked to:
- Review a bishop's decision of law on the constitutionality of the
plan of organization for the Baltimore-Washington Annual Conference;
- Respond to a request from the Minnesota Annual Conference to define the term "urban center" in Paragraph 2548.7 of the Book of Discipline;
- Review a bishop's decision of law in the Pacific Northwest Annual
Conference on the authority of a district superintendent to require a
pastor to take a leave of absence;
- Review a bishop's decision of law in the New York Annual Conference
concerning action of the clergy executive session on a pastor on
administrative location;
- Review a bishop's decision of law in the Rocky Mountain Annual Conference on the suspension of a pastor;
- Review a bishop's decision of law in the Detroit Annual Conference
concerning a bishop's power to insist that a full-time pastor live in a
parsonage.
The Book of Discipline requires all bishops' decisions of law to be reviewed by the Judicial Council.
*Caldwell is editor of the Virginia United Methodist Advocate magazine and covers the Judicial Council for United Methodist News Service.
News media contact: Linda Green, Nashville, Tenn., (615) 742-5470 or newsdesk@umcom.org.
Related articles
Cote d'Ivoire church not fully admitted, says Judicial Council
Judicial Council: Conferences may disagree with rulings
Appeal to Judicial Council focuses on Native American programs
Cote d'Ivoire denomination joins United Methodist Church
Resources
Judicial Council Decisions
The Judicial Council
Ivory Coast |