Small churches confront challenges, seek to revitalize
Chebon Kernell served Pawnee (Okla.) Indian United Methodist Church. Today, 76 percent of the denomination's churches have 200 or less members.
A UMNS file photo by Mike DuBose.
|
By Linda Green*
June 24, 2008 | NASHVILLE, Tenn. (UMNS)
Bishop Kenneth Carder tells the 2008 General Conference that "rural congregations are among our greatest assets for evangelical and missional renewal." A UMNS photo by Mike DuBose.
|
The United Methodist Church must focus on small and
rural churches and not simply go where the wealthy are to build new
churches, says a small membership church leader.
"Small churches are the backbone of the denomination,"
said the Rev. Julia Wallace, director of ministries with small
membership churches at the United Methodist Board of Discipleship.
"It is no accident that we have a church every three to
five miles. At that time we wanted to get the church as close to people
as we can. Our job now is keep church as close to the people as we can,"
she said.
Today, 76 percent of the denomination's congregations
are small churches, which are defined as those having 200 or fewer
members and fewer than 120 in worship.
More than 40 people working with small churches across
the country participated in three June 2 telephone-conference
conversations to learn about revitalizing small churches and ministries
from the Rev. Terence Corkin, a small church expert and top executive of
the Uniting Church in Australia.
The pastors, district superintendents, directors of connectional
ministries, lay ministers and community developers also discussed
emerging issues and challenges facing small churches.
"It is important that we have conversations with people
who are trying innovative things and are learning leaders," Wallace
said. Issues like deployment of pastors, budgetary constraints, the use
of lay pastors versus ordained pastors, lay ministers and licensed local
pastors are issues that the Australian church overcame to be effective
in the towns across the countryside.
"I see the Uniting Church of Australia
as being 10 years ahead of the curve from us because it is already
dealing with some of the dire issues that we will be facing," she said.
Differences between countries
Corkin, who served for 20 years in rural ministries before he became top executive in the Uniting Church eight years ago, described the similarities and differences between rural churches in the United States and in Australia and the changes small churches are encountering.
The Rev. Julia Wallace
|
"We have significant experience of congregations that are
self-supporting with a very modest amount of external relationship with
the wider church in ministry personnel," he said. The congregations
are "stand alone" and are linked together in various ways for mutual
support and resource sharing and grouped into about 30 presbyteries,
comparable to districts in The United Methodist Church.
Corkin described the Uniting Church
as a union church formed in 1977 with Congregational, Methodists and
Presbyterian churches. "It is a church that understands itself as a
national church in that it has a sense of place and presence across
every part of Australia," he said.
The church's presence is expressed through indigenous
ministries, remote area patrol ministries and community services and
through the nearly 1,800 congregations and 1,500 ministers in active
service. Some of the congregations are linked, with one minister
serving more than one locale.
In many rural areas in the United States and in Australia,
there is a drift toward reduction of services and diminishing capital,
aging people and increasing poverty which impact the ability to sustain
congregational life, he said. Rural areas also have itinerant
populations of people who come in to farm the lands, work in the mines
or other industries and then leave.
"I do think a characteristic of small churches at this
present time is their morale is not very high," Corkin said. "They have a
memory of being bigger or something else. Some have memory of another
time and are conscious of the changed circumstances in which they
live."
Measures of viability
One of the biggest issues facing small churches is
money. Many lack the resources to pay clergy salary, building
maintenance, insurance premiums and other operating costs, noted the
teleconference participants. Some churches already know they will not be
able to pay the heating bills this winter and will not be able to open
their doors.
In The United Methodist Church in the United States, self-sufficiency and financial vitality are sometimes measures of a congregation's viability.
The Rev. Terence Corkin
|
Viability, Corkin said, is not measured by a
congregation's capacity to raise enough funds to pay a minister. While
church officials may use it as a strategy to discontinue churches, "it
is not one that we believe is an adequate indicator of vitality," he
said.
There are numerous churches that cannot pay a salary but
are well-connected to one another and "are very effective in bearing
witness to the hope that is within them and inviting people to respond
to the Christ that they know," Corkin said.
The faithfulness of the church should be the measure, he
said. The faithfulness is evident in how the church works in
partnership with God and participates in the mission of God, he said.
Assets for evangelism
The reality in the United States and in Australia
is that churches are different communities even if they are only 20
kilometers or 12 miles from each other. The churches, he said,
regardless of where they are located, provide different missional
opportunities.
"Rural congregations are among our greatest assets for
evangelical and missional renewal among the people called Methodist in
the 21st century," said Bishop Kenneth Carder during a rural life
celebration at the 2008 General Conference.
Corkin agrees. "God has raised people up to call his own
in these communities and they are going to be there whether there is a
roll of members or if we are prepared to support a building continuing
to be there."
"We don't make the church," he said. The church exists
because of the saving work of Jesus Christ to confront and call people
into new life and those people are called into new life in community.
Wallace spoke of a church of eight people who feed 150
every day. The church's feeding ministry launched a partnership with
others and caused all involved to think about ministry in new and
different ways. "They have learned to be that community which pulls
other faithful people together to be in relationship with the homeless.
"They had to figure it out. I think people today want to
figure out how to be church," she said. "People want
opportunities for ministry."
Using all gifts
The use of teams for ministry is critical in
revitalizing small churches in the future, Wallace said. "We must move
away from being dependent on one person, whether that is a clergy pastor
or a lay pastor," she said. "We must begin to celebrate being the whole
people of God in that place and use all of the gifts we have been
given. The days of clergy dependency are forcing us to now rethink of
the way we are going to be a church."
Revitalizing existing churches and planting new ones is
the focus of Path One, an organized strategy team on congregational
development under the United Methodist Board of Discipleship.
Path One seeks to help the church start 650
congregations by 2012. The emphasis on church growth aims to return the
denomination to its evangelistic heritage of starting a new congregation
every day.
"The time for revitalization is a reality," Wallace said. "We happen to have everything we need."
*Green is a United Methodist News Service news writer based in Nashville, Tenn.
News media contact: Linda Green, e-mail: newsdesk@umcom.org.
Related Articles
Rural churches celebrate ‘planting seeds of hope’
Ministry trades toys for toy guns in Iraq
New Duke program will address rural church challenges
Resources
The Small Membership Church
United Methodist Board of Discipleship
Uniting Church of Australia
United Methodist Rural Fellowship |