United Methodist legislators disagree on reform details
A UMNS Report
By Tom Gillem*
Oct. 13, 2009
As the debate over reforming the nation’s health care system rages
in Washington, the 53 United Methodists who are members of Congress are
listening to their constituents and deciding the best path to follow.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow
But their feelings about the various reform proposals in both the
House and Senate tend to echo the positions of their particular
political party. All think some reform is needed, but how to make it
happen is the issue.
Michigan Democrat Debbie Stabenow, one of nine United Methodists in
the Senate, says the need for health insurance reform is imperative.
“We know America cannot continue on this road where health insurance
premiums skyrocketed 128 percent, while wages have risen only 38
percent,” she says. “The costs of health insurance premiums are growing
rapidly, and too many families do not have access to affordable
coverage that they deserve.”
Stabenow, a member of the Senate Finance Committee, says health care
reform legislation should “keep what works and fix what is broken.”
“I would like to see the system reformed to provide a public health
insurance choice and competition so that all families and individuals
have access to affordable health care,” she says. “I am very hopeful
that we can get it done this year.”

Sen. Pat Roberts
Across the aisle, Sen. Pat Roberts, a Kansas Republican, agrees
reform is needed, but disagrees on the specifics of the legislation.
“I believe we need reform but not just any reform
– the right reform that allows those who like their health plans to
keep them while enabling those in need to get better coverage,” Roberts
says.
“We need reform to ensure that patients aren’t turned away for
pre-existing conditions,” he says. “We need to ensure reforms don’t
interfere with the doctor-patient relationship or ration care. We also
need to make sure that reform isn’t paid for on the backs of our
seniors through Medicare cuts.”
Roberts, a member of both the Senate finance and health committees,
says Republican senators have been largely shut out of the process of
writing the current Senate proposals.
“If we are going to have comprehensive health care reform that
ensures Americans access to quality, affordable care, it should be
considered on a bipartisan basis,” Roberts says. “It is better to have
thoughtful, step-by-step reform than rushing to get something at any
cost.”
His Kansas constituents are suspicious of the health care reform proposals, he says.
“Many of them worry they could lose their care, and most are
concerned that the proposals will do nothing to slow the ever-growing
costs of care,” he says. “And finally, they are worried about the costs
to the taxpayer and future generations of Americans.”
‘Do no harm’

Rep. Bill Posey
In the House, where there are 44 United Methodists, Rep. Bill Posey,
R-Fla., also says he believes reforms are needed, “but first and
foremost, we must do no harm to the 80 percent of those who currently
have health insurance and want to keep the coverage that they now have.
... Our focus should be to help those that lack insurance to find
affordable coverage. We don't need to throw the proverbial baby out
with the bathwater, or turn the world upside-down to do that.”
Health care reform legislation will have no support from House
Republicans unless the Democratic leadership stops trying to push it
through without GOP input, Posey says.
“You have to be willing to respect the opinion of the other side,
and the current House leadership has failed to do that,” he says. “Even
on the issue of illegals. You know, the president represented that the
bill says illegals are ineligible, but twice they (the Democrats)
defeated on party lines amendments from the Republicans to put in a
check to make sure you were a legal citizen before you enrolled. There
are a lot of people who perceive this as just a step where you give
illegals medical rights and then you give them voting rights, then
what's next?”
He says Republicans believe providing a tax credit of $2,500 for an
individual or $5,500 for a family “would be the cheapest way for the
government to solve the (health care) problem – to let them solve the
problem themselves with money they are allowed to keep in their pockets
for that purpose.”
In addition, Republicans feel people who do not have group insurance
should be able to pool coverage through alumni associations or other
affinity groups, which would increase competition among private plans
and bring prices down, Posey says.
Town hall meetings
Democratic Rep. Betty Sutton says she hosted and attended many
meetings in her northern Ohio district during the August recess to talk
about health care reform with constituents.

Rep. Betty Sutton
“Unfortunately, I have also heard a good deal of misinformation and
inaccurate interpretations of the proposals and have attempted to
provide information to correct the record,” she says. “For example,
rumors about death panels and government access to bank accounts have
had to be repeatedly dispelled.”
The opinions of her constituents differ greatly on the pending
proposals, with some favoring a single-payer system and others wanting
to “inject choice and competition into the system by providing
consumers with the potential to choose a public option.”
“Some constituents have also indicated that they want me to vote no,
regardless of what any health reform bill contains,” she says. “Many
supporters have encouraged me to fight for a public option, while some
opposed have issued ‘demands’ that I vote no regardless of the contents
proposed.”
Sutton says she believes all Americans should have access to affordable quality health care.
“We should inject competition in health care reform. The way we
achieve this is by creating a public option to compete with private
insurers as one choice that consumers could purchase if they so
desire,” the Ohio congresswoman says.
Any health care reform legislation should also end pre-existing
conditions and both lifetime and annual caps and stop “the overpayment
that private insurers are getting through Medicare advantage.”

Rep. Rick Larsen
Democratic Rep. Rick Larsen says he was called a liar by some people
attending one of his town hall meetings in Washington state even before
the meeting began.
“Some of the town hall disruptions, I think, are to the detriment of
the folks who are looking for information to help them better
understand the legislation,” he says. “Those are the people that we
need to talk to because they have concerns about health care and they
have concerns about the bill and want to understand the direction that
Congress is heading so they can understand the kinds of changes that
may take place.”
After hearing the opinions expressed at the town hall meetings,
Larsen says he feels reform is needed because the status quo is not
acceptable.
“I challenged people in town halls to tell me what they thought was
acceptable, if they did not want reform, and tell me what they thought
was unacceptable, if they wanted reform. And honestly, the folks who
opposed health care reform couldn't come up with any,” he says.
“Generally, I didn't hear any specific reasons why they opposed health
care reform except that they oppose health care reform.”
Spreading the cost
Larsen says he will support the public option as long as it is not
permanently tied to Medicare reimbursement rates, which he feels
unfairly impacts Washington and 16 other states that receive lower
rates because they provide seniors with health care at relatively lower
costs and better health outcomes.
Reform legislation should include insurance market reforms that end
discrimination in coverage based on age, gender and pre-existing
conditions, “but we can only do that cost effectively if we couple it
with an individual insurance mandate, so you can spread any cost among
a wider group of people,” he says. People who make so little income
that they cannot buy health insurance on their own must be supported,
he says.
“I think if we're going to expand coverage, we're going to have to,
as a country, step up for those who can't currently afford health
insurance,” he says. “There is certainly a good economic reason to do
that because we're all carrying that cost right now when those folks go
to the emergency room. But there's a good moral reason to do that, as
well.”
*Gillem is a freelance writer and photographer in Brentwood, Tenn.
News media contact: Tim Tanton, Nashville, Tenn., (615) 742-5470 or newsdesk@umcom.org.
Related Articles
Women call for affordable health care for all
United Methodists struggle with health care reform
Edelman urges health care coverage for all children
Healing Health Care: A Forum
Resources
United Methodist Women
Interfaith Week of Prayer for Health Care
United Methodist Women: Healing Health Care
Comments will be moderated. Please see our Comment Policy for more information.
Comment Policy |
We invite you to join the dialogue. Share your comments.
Post a comment