This translation is not completely accurate as it was automatically generated by a computer.
Powered by
A UMNS Report
By Heather Hahn*
7:30 P.M. EST October 7, 2010
The District of Columbia Superior Court has ruled that funds to
construct the United Methodist Building were not given to only support
work in the areas of temperance and alcohol. A UMNS photo courtesy of
the GBCS.
View in Photo Gallery
The United Methodist Church’s social action agency can use funds
given to the church’s building on Capitol Hill for advocacy beyond
temperance-related issues, a District of Columbia judge has ruled.
In her Oct. 6 decision, Superior Court Judge Rhonda Reid Winston
found “clear and convincing evidence” donations to the predecessor
agencies of the United Methodist Board of Church and Society “were not
restricted solely” to promoting temperance.
The 78-page ruling resolves a longtime dispute over whether the
Board of Church and Society was properly using rental fees and endowment
funds related the United Methodist Building on Capitol Hill. At stake
was about $1 million in annual revenue, said Jim Winkler, the board’s
chief executive.
“The most immediate impact is that (the ruling) lifts the cloud of
suspicion that has been hanging over the agency for 10 years about the
‘misuse’ of funds from the United Methodist building,” Winkler said. “I
think the judge was crystal-clear on that count. It’s great to have
that sense of absolution that money is being used properly.”
The board’s trustees filed a request in early 2007 for a judge’s
declaratory decision on the appropriate use of the building endowment
funds. Specifically, the board sought a reformation of a 1965
Declaration of Trust to allow the use of the endowment fund for more
than strictly alcohol-related matters.
The judge ruled in the board’s favor. She wrote that the authors of
the 1965 trust declaration were mistaken in indicating that gifts made
in the early part of the 20th century were meant only for temperance
purposes.
“The exhibits clearly show that throughout the years, the Boards
were also authorized to, and did, perform substantial work on other
‘public morals’ issues,” Winston wrote.
Intervenors’ concerns
The case went to trial Oct. 6, 2008, and Winston heard final arguments on Oct. 22 that year.
The attorney general’s office for the District of Columbia argued
against the board. In addition, five individual United Methodists joined
the case as intervenors, through a procedure that allows nonparties to
have their voices heard in litigation.
The five intervenors — C. Pat Curtin, Carolyn Elias, Leslie O.
Fowler, John Patton Meadows and John Stumbo — are all United Methodists
who were delegates at one time or another to the General Conference,
the denomination’s top lawmaking body. One of the intervenors, Curtin,
is now deceased.
The five were supported by the Coalition for United Methodist
Accountability, which consists of three conservative renewal groups:
Good News, the Institute on Religion & Democracy, and the
Confessing Movement. The three groups have been frequently at odds with
the Board of Church and Society over its advocacy work on social
justice issues.
The Rev. Rob Renfroe, the publisher of Good News magazine and a
former member of the Board of Church and Society, said the groups have
not decided whether they will appeal the judge’s ruling. But he does
not expect the disagreements with the board to end anytime soon.
“I find it very difficult to believe that people who originally gave
money for this purpose to buy the Methodist building that they thought
this money would ever be used to lobby for abortion rights or a
particular health-care plan,” he said. “These are all things the Board
of Church and Society has done.”
Winkler has a different take. The board is still involved in work
advocating against drug and alcohol abuse as well as other social
issues.
“I think social justice and evangelism are two sides of the same
coin,” Winkler said. “I think our church decided a long, long time ago
to have our voice in the public arena. … So as faithful Christians, we
are in the halls of power speaking on behalf of the marginalized and
the poor as well as peace and justice.”
Changing work
The Board of Church and Society is the successor to the Board of
Temperance, Prohibition and Public Morals and two other agencies of the
former Methodist Episcopal Church. The temperance board led efforts to
construct The Methodist Building in Washington, completed in 1923 at a
cost of $650,000.
The Methodist Building, located next to the Supreme Court and across
the street from the U.S. Capitol, is the only nongovernment building on
Capitol Hill and was the first national Protestant agency to locate in
Washington, according to the Board of Church and Society.
At the dedication in 1924, the building’s purpose was described as a
“sentinel and a supporter for social reform in the Capital; a voice for
the religious community, a visible witness.”
Its adjacent apartment and office complex, constructed in 1931, has
been home to congressional representatives, Methodist bishops and
Supreme Court justices.
Over the past decade, some church leaders have questioned the
legality of using income from the building assets for purposes other
than addressing problems related to alcohol, Winkler said. That led the
board’s trustees to turn to the court for resolution.
“This is not a victory for the General Board of Church and Society;
this is a victory for the entire United Methodist denomination,” said
New York attorney Fredrick K. Brewington, chair of the board’s trustees.
“The reason we brought this action was to settle this dispute so that
we wouldn’t have this conflict within our midst.”
*Hahn is a multimedia news reporter for United Methodist News Service.
News media contact: Heather Hahn, Nashville, Tenn., (615) 742-5470 or newsdesk@umcom.org.
About UMC.org
RSS Feed
Press Center
Contact Us